http://www.patentlit.com/2008/07/11/pitts-late-invite-crashes-infringment-party-with-varian/ Tracking Patent Appeals Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:17:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.patentlit.com/2008/07/11/pitts-late-invite-crashes-infringment-party-with-varian/comment-page-1/#comment-72 jay Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:53:48 +0000 http://www.patentlit.com/2008/07/11/pitts-late-invite-crashes-infringment-party-with-varian/#comment-72 It can be a dismissal with prejudice against UPitt, of course, which denies Carnegie-Mellon the opportunity to sue Varian because CM cannot join UPitt. I would think that CM's relief would then be against UPitt based on UPitt's failure to join CM. It can be a dismissal with prejudice against UPitt, of course, which denies Carnegie-Mellon the opportunity to sue Varian because CM cannot join UPitt. I would think that CM’s relief would then be against UPitt based on UPitt’s failure to join CM.

]]> http://www.patentlit.com/2008/07/11/pitts-late-invite-crashes-infringment-party-with-varian/comment-page-1/#comment-71 jay Sat, 12 Jul 2008 14:52:56 +0000 http://www.patentlit.com/2008/07/11/pitts-late-invite-crashes-infringment-party-with-varian/#comment-71 It can be a dismissal with prejudice against UPitt, of course, which denies Carnegie-Mellon the opportunity to sue Varian because CM cannot join UPitt. I would think that CM's relief would then be against UPitt based on UPitt's failure to join CM. It can be a dismissal with prejudice against UPitt, of course, which denies Carnegie-Mellon the opportunity to sue Varian because CM cannot join UPitt. I would think that CM’s relief would then be against UPitt based on UPitt’s failure to join CM.

]]> http://www.patentlit.com/2008/07/11/pitts-late-invite-crashes-infringment-party-with-varian/comment-page-1/#comment-70 Mikael Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:58:10 +0000 http://www.patentlit.com/2008/07/11/pitts-late-invite-crashes-infringment-party-with-varian/#comment-70 But can it be with prejudice as to Carnegie Mellon--not a party to the action? But can it be with prejudice as to Carnegie Mellon–not a party to the action?

]]>