PATracer

Tracking Patent Appeals

2008-1155 MIT v. Microsoft

Posted on | January 28, 2008 | No Comments

ED/TX  5:01cv00344                  

This case was first filed in 2001: 1630+ dockets entries and one earlier appeal (462 F.3d 1344) later, plaintiffs stipulated to non-infringement by Microsoft after the Court contrued to the term "aesthetic correction circuitry" to be limited to hardware rather than hardware and software.  Judge David Folsom adopted Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven’s Report and Recommendation, which relies on the Federal Circuit’s first decision as well as prosecution history statements. 

Comments

Leave a Reply





  • Categories

  • Archives