2008-1155 MIT v. Microsoft
ED/TX 5:01cv00344 This case was first filed in 2001: 1630+ dockets entries and one earlier appeal (462 F.3d 1344) later, plaintiffs stipulated to non-infringement by Microsoft after the Court contrued to the term "aesthetic correction circuitry" to be limited to hardware rather than hardware and software. Judge David Folsom [...]
Subscribe via RSS or Email
Introducing PATalert from PATracer
PATalerts: Recent CAFC Opinions 
- BATCHELOR V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Appeal Number: 2011-3189 - THE DOW CHEMICAL CO. V. NOVA CHEMICAL CORP. [ERRATA 2]
Appeal Number: 2010-1526 - LASERFACTURING, INC. V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP. [ORDER]
Appeal Number: 2009-1013 - SYNQOR, INC. V. ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [ORDER]
Appeal Number: 2011-1191 - CHADWELL V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD [ORDER]
Appeal Number: 2011-3174 - LAZARO V. DEPT. OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Appeal Number: 2011-3190 - SEARCY V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD [ORDER]
Appeal Number: 2012-3033 - SEARCY V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD [ORDER]
Appeal Number: 2012-3054 - SCHROERLUCKE V. U.S. [ORDER]
Appeal Number: 2012-5026 - THORNER V. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC.
Appeal Number: 2011-1114
